Home Genre Ranking Short Stories
Create
Get the APP hot
Home / Literature / What Is Free Trade?
What Is Free Trade?

What Is Free Trade?

Frédérick Bastiat
5.0
Literature
23 Chapters
142 View
Read Now

Bastiat's "Sophismes Economiques" was translated during the free-trade agitation in England, by Mr. Porter, the author of " Tho Progress of the Nation," and was widely circulated, under the title of " Popular Fallacies regarding General ...

Contents

Chapter 1 PLENTY AND SCARCITY.

Which is better for man and for society-abundance or scarcity?

What! Can such a question be asked? Has it ever been pretended, is it possible to maintain, that scarcity is better than plenty?

Yes: not only has it been maintained, but it is still maintained. Congress says so; many of the newspapers (now happily diminishing in number) say so; a large portion of the public say so; indeed, the scarcity theory is by far the more popular one of the two.

Has not Congress passed laws which prohibit the importation of foreign productions by the maintenance of excessive duties? Does not the Tribune maintain that it is advantageous to limit the supply of iron manufactures and cotton fabrics, by restraining any one from bringing them to market, but the manufacturers in New England and Pennsylvania? Do we not hear it complained every day: Our importations are too large; We are buying too much from abroad? Is there not an Association of Ladies, who, though they have not kept their promise, still, promised each other not to wear any clothing which was manufactured in other countries?

Now tariffs can only raise prices by diminishing the quantity of goods offered for sale. Therefore, statesmen, editors, and the public generally, believe that scarcity is better than abundance.

But why is this; why should men be so blind as to maintain that scarcity is better than plenty?

Because they look at price, but forget quantity.

But let us see.

A man becomes rich in proportion to the remunerative nature of his labor; that is to say, in proportion as he sells his produce at a high price. The price of his produce is high in proportion to its scarcity. It is plain, then, that, so far as regards him at least, scarcity enriches him. Applying, in turn, this manner of reasoning to each class of laborers individually, the scarcity theory is deduced from it. To put this theory into practice, and in order to favor each class of labor, an artificial scarcity is produced in every kind of produce by prohibitory tariffs, by restrictive laws, by monopolies, and by other analogous measures.

In the same manner it is observed that when an article is abundant, it brings a small price. The gains of the producer are, of course, less. If this is the case with all produce, all producers are then poor. Abundance, then, ruins society; and as any strong conviction will always seek to force itself into practice, we see the laws of the country struggling to prevent abundance.

Now, what is the defect in this argument? Something tells us that it must be wrong; but where is it wrong? Is it false? No. And yet it is wrong? Yes. But how? It is incomplete.

Man produces in order to consume. He is at once producer and consumer. The argument given above, considers him only under the first point of view. Let us look at him in the second character, and the conclusion will be different. We may say:

The consumer is rich in proportion as he buys at a low price. He buys at a low price in proportion to the abundance of the articles in demand; abundance, then, enriches him. This reasoning, extended to all consumers, must lead to the theory of abundance.

Which theory is right?

Can we hesitate to say? Suppose that by following out the scarcity theory, suppose that through prohibitions and restrictions we were compelled not only to make our own iron, but to grow our own coffee; in short, to obtain everything with difficulty and great outlay of labor. We then take an account of stock and see what our savings are.

Afterward, to test the other theory, suppose we remove the duties on iron, the duties on coffee, and the duties on everything else, so that we shall obtain everything with as little difficulty and outlay of labor as possible. If we then take an account of stock, is it not certain that we shall find more iron in the country, more coffee, more everything else?

Choose then, fellow-countrymen, between scarcity and abundance, between much and little, between Protection and Free Trade. You now know which theory is the right one, for you know the fruits they each bear.

But, it will be answered, if we are inundated with foreign goods and produce, our specie, our precious product of California, our dollars, will leave the country.

Well, what of that? Man is not fed with coin. He does not dress in gold, nor warm himself with silver. What does it matter, then, whether there be more or less specie in the country, provided there be more bread in the cupboard, more meat in the larder, more clothes in the wardrobe, and more fuel in the cellar?

Again, it will be objected, if we accustom ourselves to depend upon England for iron, what shall we do in case of a war with that country?

To this I reply, we shall then be compelled to produce iron ourselves. But, again I am told, we will not be prepared; we will have no furnaces in blast, no forges ready. True; neither will there be any time when war shall occur that the country will not be already filled with all the iron we shall want until we can make it here. Did the Confederates in the late war lack for iron? Why, then, shall we manufacture our own staples and bolts because we may some day or other have a quarrel with our ironmonger!

To sum up:

A radical antagonism exists between the vender and the buyer.

The former wishes the article offered to be scarce, and the supply to be small, so that the price may be high.

The latter wishes it abundant and the supply to be large, so that the price may be low.

The laws, which should at least remain neutral, take part for the vender against the buyer; for the producer against the consumer; for high against low prices; for scarcity against abundance; for protection against free trade. They act, if not intentionally, at least logically, upon the principle that a nation is rich in proportion as it is in want of everything.

Continue Reading
img View More Comments on App
Latest Release: Chapter 23 CONCLUSION.   08-13 19:03
img
img
Chapter 1 PLENTY AND SCARCITY.
06/12/2017
Chapter 2 OBSTACLES TO WEALTH AND CAUSES OF WEALTH.
06/12/2017
Chapter 3 EFFORT—RESULT.
06/12/2017
Chapter 4 EQUALIZING OF THE FACILITIES OF PRODUCTION.
06/12/2017
Chapter 5 OUR PRODUCTIONS ARE OVERLOADED WITH INTERNAL TAXES——
06/12/2017
Chapter 6 BALANCE OF TRADE.
06/12/2017
Chapter 7 A PETITION.
06/12/2017
Chapter 8 DISCRIMINATING DUTIES.
06/12/2017
Chapter 9 A WONDERFUL DISCOVERY.
06/12/2017
Chapter 10 RECIPROCITY.
06/12/2017
Chapter 11 ABSOLUTE PRICES.
06/12/2017
Chapter 12 DOES PROTECTION RAISE THE RATE OF WAGES
06/12/2017
Chapter 13 THEORY AND PRACTICE.
06/12/2017
Chapter 14 CONFLICT OF PRINCIPLES.
06/12/2017
Chapter 15 RECIPROCITY AGAIN.
06/12/2017
Chapter 16 OBSTRUCTED RIVERS PLEAD FOR THE PROHIBITIONISTS.
06/12/2017
Chapter 17 A NEGATIVE RAILROAD.
06/12/2017
Chapter 18 THERE ARE NO ABSOLUTE PRINCIPLES.
06/12/2017
Chapter 19 NATIONAL INDEPENDENCE.
06/12/2017
Chapter 20 HUMAN LABOR—NATIONAL LABOR.
06/12/2017
Chapter 21 RAW MATERIAL.
06/12/2017
Chapter 22 METAPHORS.
06/12/2017
Chapter 23 CONCLUSION.
06/12/2017
MoboReader

© 2018-now CHANGDU (HK) TECHNOLOGY LIMITED

6/F MANULIFE PLACE 348 KWUN TONG ROAD KL

Resources

For Authors Contact Us Tags Completed

Referrals

Law

Conditions of Service Privacy Policy Copyright Complaints
Download App
icon APP STORE
icon GOOGLE PLAY