om the head of Jove,-Jove in this case being England, and the armor being the heritage which the average American colonist had secured in England before he crossed the Atl
joyed by the people in groups and accompanied by group singing and dancing,-like the psalms and the simpler ballads,-or they were the record of folk tradition, slowly and variously developed through generations and finally collected into a continuous story like the Iliad, the
epics of the older European nations to whom we trace our ancestry. Except for a few place-names even the language of America owes nothing to that of the Indians, for the English tongue is a compound of Greek and Latin and French and German. Our liter
moving-picture house of to-day; a great architect was adorning London with his churches; poets and novelists, preachers and statesmen, scientists and scholars, were all working vividly and keenly. There was an active enthusiasm for the day's doings, a kind of living assent to Hamlet's commentary, on "this goodly frame, the earth, ... this most excellent canopy, the air, ... this brave o'erhanging firmament
the rise of Puritan power, culminating with the execution of Charles II and the establishment of the Commonwealth under the Cromwells from 1649 to 1660, and the peaceful restoration of monarchy at the latter date. It was during the mid-stages of these developments that the first settlements were made in English America. Both factions included large numb
Alaska fifty years later; they hoped to make their money in the west and to spend it back in the east, and they had little thought of literature, either as a thing to enjoy or as a thing to create. When they wrote they did so to give information about the country, the Indians, and the new conditions of living, or to keep in touch with relatives, legal authorities, or sources of money supply; and always they had in mind the thought of attracting new settlers, for they needed labor more than anything else. They made no attempt at gener
oppression that they had learned in England at the cost of blood and suffering. They settled in compact towns where they could believe and worship together; they put up "meetinghouses" where they could listen to the preacher on the Lord's Day and where they could transact public business, with the same man as "moderator," on week days. He was the controlling power-"pastor," or shepherd, and "dominie," or master, of the community. And when the meetinghouses were finished, the settlers erected as their next public buildings the schoolhouses, where the children might learn to read the Scriptures so that they could "foil the ould deluder, Satan." Education became compulsory as well as public. The Puritans' place-names were Indian-Massachusetts and Agawam; derived from E
om persecution there and from the consequent need to avoid it and, at the same time, made many Royalists glad of a chance to escape to some more peaceful spot. From 1660 on, with the return of the Royalists to power in England, Puritan migration was once more started to the North, and the home country was again secure for the followers of the king. But the real charact
actice when they rule out of court everything produced in this country before the days of Irving and Cooper. A great deal of the earlier writing should, of course, be considered only as source material for the historian; but some of it has the same claim to attention as the old chronicles,
te them at all, were quite like most of the earliest Northern writings of the sort. The one outstanding difference is that in whatever they wrote, the religious motive for settlement and the belief in a personal Providence were less insistently recorded than by the Puritans. Thus where John Smith was content with the general phrase "it pleased God," Anthony Thach
o nothing but follow the precepts which God had revealed to them about life here and life hereafter. They were, in their own serious way, happy in their confident possession of truth and sternly resolved to bestow it or, if necessary, impose it on all whom they could control. Their failure was recorded with their earliest attempts, and it came, not because of their particular weakness or the strength of th
journal of the first year in America and his history are clearly and sometimes finely written, and give ample proof of his stalwart character-"fervent in spirit, serving the Lord," and free from the personal narrowness which is often mistakenly ascribed to all Puritans. In his account, for example, of the reasons for the Pilgrims' removal from Leyden the c
he things feared might never befall; others, by provident care and the use of good means, might in a great measure be prevented; and all of them, through the help of God, by fortitude and patience, might either be borne or overcome. True it was, that such attempts were not to be made and undertaken without good ground and reason; not rashly or lightly, as many
s coupled with a desperate religious bigotry
nicknaming him Captain Shrimp. He went further, and questioned their motives and their honesty, their integrity in business, and their sincerity in religion. A great deal of what he wrote about them was libelously unfair; he should never be taken as an authority for facts unless supported by other writers of his day. But underneath all his clever abuse of them and their ways, there is an evident basis of truth which is confirmed by the sober study of history. Although the Puritans were brave, strong, self-denying servants of the stern God whom they worshiped, they were sometimes sanctimonious, sometimes cruelly vengeful, and all too often so eager to achieve His ends on earth that they were regardless of the means they took. At the very beginning of their life in America, Thomas Morton held these characteristics up to public scorn; and in so doing he made his book an omen of the long, losing battle they were destined to fight. Morton's effectiveness as a writer lies in the fact that however ill-behaved he may have been, he was attractively-maybe dangerously-genial in character. He was in truth "a cheerful liar"; but he lied like the writer of fiction who disregards the exact facts because he is telling a good story as well as he can and because that good story is based o
t, I mean a favourite, rising in a kingdom; a new Opinion spreading in Religion." The second section of the book is devoted to fashions of dress, an evergreen subject for the satirist. Ward's attitude toward woman as an inferior creature was almost as primitive as that of the cave man, and apparently he would have liked it better if the "bullymong drossock" had dressed with the simplicity of a cave woman. As it was he felt that the lady of fashion was "the very gizzard of a trifle, the product of the quarter of a cypher, the epitome of Nothing"; and he had equal contempt for tailors who "spend their lives in making fidle-cases for futulous Women's phansies; which are the very pettitoes of Infirmity, the giblets of perquisquilian toyes." The remainder of the work is given to a discussion of affairs of English state, written with the same aggressive positiveness. The most interesting bit of it is the portion
he lengthening chain of this printed controversy be considered as literature, yet it has the same right to inclusion as the English disquisitions of Wyclif, Jeremy Taylor, and John Wesley. An English prisoner in Newgate, assailing persecution for cause of conscience, had been answered by John Cotton. Then followed Williams's "The Bloody Tenent of Persecution for cause of Conscience, discussed in a Conference between Truth and Peace" (1644); Cotton's reply "The Bloody Tenent washed and made white in the Blood of the Lamb" (1647); and Williams's rejoi
who did not believe it in their hearts, and that the power of the magistrates extended only to the bodies and the property of the subjects and not to their religious convictions. The second two were that America belonged to the Indians and not to the king of England, and that t
hangeth, yieldi
ils himself
ustom should co
anaged to get a permanent foothold in Rhode Island, where he opposed the still more liberal Quakers almost as violently as the churchmen of old and new England had o
K L
l Refe
rd. The Transit
nings of New Engla
y told by Contemporaries. V
American Literat
rican Literature. Colonial
terary History of Amer
dual A
ap of Virginia, with a Description of the Country (Oxfo
ble Ed
Tracts, Vol. II, N
oc. Coll., Se
lec
arly American W
yclopedia of American Litera
Library of American Lite
y Virginia. L. G.
es. G. P. Winshi
h Plantation. First published in Mas
ble Ed
eane, edi
vis, edi
lec
rly American Wri
ibrary of American Litera
lish Canaan, or New Ca
ble Ed
ts, Vol. II, No. 5. 18
ety Publications. 1888
lec
rly American Wri
Cyclopedia of American Li
ibrary of American Litera
ple Cobler of Aggawam i
ble Ed
l Tracts, Vol. I
Society of Ipswich,
gra
haniel Ward. J.
lec
rly American Wri
Cyclopedia of American Li
ibrary of American Litera
ce, 1866-1874. 6 vols. Contains likewise J. Cotton's contributions to the c
able
675. Mass. Hist. Soc.
hy and
ms; a Study of the Life, etc.
ife of John Milt
illiams, the Pioneer of
lec
rly American Wri
Cyclopedia of American Li
ibrary of American Litera
reatment o
r
lodrama (1808), in Representative Plays by Americ
Virginia; a National Drama (1830), in Representa
sa
e at Concord, 200th Ann
gland Two Centuries
of History, in Literary Re
ct
J. G. Standis
J. G. Betty A
. G. David Ald
Champion and The Maypole of M
oung Goodman Brown, in
thaniel. The
y. By Order o
ary. The Ol
J. L. Me
et
tory (edited by B.E.
n poets (edited by N.U. Wal
AND P
ow far Morton's evident prejudice discredited his account of the
for the admirable traits of Puritanism and see, also
atment of the Period-and decide how far he may have sympath
thaniel Ward's residence in America; decide on the degree to wh
Nathaniel Ward in this work and of Jo
ponding number of pages in "The Simple Co