img Egerton Ryerson and Education in Upper Canada  /  Chapter 4 No.4 | 30.77%
Download App
Reading History

Chapter 4 No.4

Word Count: 5097    |    Released on: 01/12/2017

CANADA FROM 1783

ng's College charter, Sir George Murray, in a communication to Sir John Colborne, said:[26] "It would be deservedly a subject of regret to His Majesty's Government, if the University, recently established at York, should prove to have been founded upon principles which cannot be made to accord with the general feelings and opinions of those for whose advantage it was intended.... I have observed that your predecessor (Sir Peregrine Maitland) in the Gove

you will apprise them that their representations on the existing charter of the University have attracted the serious attention of His Majesty's Government and tha

ed the College Council and declared that no immediate steps were to be taken toward active University work

thing of the Common Schools. Referring to Grammar Schools he says:[29] "It will be seen that in some places girls are admitted.[30] This happens from the want of good female schools, and perhaps from the more rapid progress which children are supposed to make under experienced and able schoolmasters. It is to be wished, however, that separate schools for the sexes were established

also made an excellent practical suggestion.[31] "The Provincial Board, therefore, would submit with all deference, that in addition to the publi

l that had Dr. Strachan followed up this suggestion by pressing it upon the Legislature, and by di

reform the Royal Grammar School [the District School at York] and to incorporate it with the University recently endowed by His Majesty, and to introduce a system in that Seminary which will open to the youth of the Province the means of receiving a liberal and extensive course of instruct

tion in arresting the working of King's College was one proof of this, although his subsequent action in founding Upper Canada College solely on his own responsibility showed his belief in the power of the Crown to take independent action. He saw that the District Grammar Schools were very inefficient and were touching the lives of an insignificant proportion of the people of Upper Canada. He foresaw that for some years the revenue to be derived from

f the Anglican Church; that in many cases the schools themselves were merely stepping-stones for the clergy of the Anglican Church; that they were under no efficient inspection; that they were quite as expensive to those parents who did not live immediately beside them as much better schools in the United States; and finally that as only 108 pupils in the whole Province were studying languages in these schools, that their work could be done equally well by really good Common Schools. The report lamented the low salaries of teachers in Common Schools and suggested that no Government grants should be given unless the managers

prepared a series of resolutions which were adopted by the Assem

rovince, not being amenable for his conduct to any tr

King's College be a clergyman of the Anglican Church, and

not by virtue of his clerical office

King's College ought not to be required

ing's College upon any professing Christian who passed the required

f King's College is in any way

it more acceptable to the people of Upper Canada. The Council in reply recommended that instead of the Archdeacon of York

ng boarders. The classical and mathematical masters were to receive £300 a year and similar privileges. The Assembly had suggested that the new school should be known as Colborne College, but the name adopted was Upper Canada College. The school opened in 1830 with a staff of seven specialists, nearly all chosen in England. The work was carried on in the buildings of the old Grammar

tined for commerce and mechanical pursuits. The Governor's attempt to give Canadians a high-class collegiate school seemed only partially successful. The error was in attempting to adapt to a new country a form of school that suited the

strict praying for endowed and well-equipped schools similar to Upper Canada College. The petitioners resented the concentration at York of two important institut

ntly things appear when viewed through different eyes. The first is from a letter written in 1833 by Rev. Thomas Radcliffe.[36] "Future generations will bless the memory of Sir John Colborne, who, to the many advantages derived from the equity and wisdom of his government, has added

be mentioned, are insufficient to gratify the rapacious appetite of the 'Established Church' managers, who, in order to accumulate wealth and live in opulence, charge the children of His Majesty's subjects ten times as high fees as are required by the less amply endowed Seminary at Quebec. They have another reason for so doing. The College (already a monop

mpts to make it popular with the mass of the people proved ineffective. The Legislature gave it an annual grant somewhat unwil

Council of King's College because it tended to delay the opening of lectures in that institution. In 1849, when the Baldwin University Bill made

us denominations. They felt that although Upper Canada College was non-sectarian in a legal sense, yet, inasmu

cteristics of the system of education which it is contemplated to pursue in the proposed Seminary, we may observe that it will be such as to produce habits of intellectual labour and activity; a diligent and profitable improvement of time; bodily health and vigour, a fitness and relish for agricultural and mechanical, as well as for other pursuits; virtuous principles and Christian morals. On the importance of education generally we may remark, it is as necessary as the light-it should be as common as water, and as free as air.... Education among the people is the best security of a good government and constitutional liberty; it yields a steady, unbending support to the former, and effectually protects the latter. An educated people are always a loyal people to good government; and the first object of a wise government should be the education of the people. An educated people are always enterprising in all kinds of general and local improvements. An ignorant population are equally fit for, a

ge, but it foreshadows the fundamental principles upon whic

establishment of a Literary and Theological Seminary at Pleasant Bay, in Prince Edward County. This semin

e School Reserves and the failure of the people of Upper Canada to secure the free Grammar Schools for which the Crown Lands were appropriated in 1798. Sever

were wholly inadequate to perform t

in setting apart the immense School Res

d been largely concerned in appropriating the lion

be now (1831) sufficiently productive to give great assistance to

om time to time ought to be paid in to the Receiver-G

Government was fully seized of the situation in regard to the charter of King's College. Lord Goderich said,[42] "I am to convey through you to the Members of the Corporation of King's College, at the earnest recommendation and advice of His Majesty's Government, that they do forthwith surrender[43] to His Majesty the charter of King's

etter schools. Had the Executive Council and Legislative Council been equally zealous in the cause of education, the fathers

for schools in 1831 was $11,200] to support competent, respectable, and well-educated teachers, has degraded Common School teaching from a regular business to a mere matter of convenience to transient persons, or common idlers, who often teach the school one season and leave it vacant until it accommodates some other like person to take it in hand, whereby the minds of our youth are left without cultivation, or, what

we will speedily reorganize our schools." The Assembly knew what was needed and knew how to remedy the existing

the 258,330 acres of School lands, being the balance of the original grant of half a million acres made in 1798, and from which had already been made extensive grants to endow King's College and Upper Canada College. Much of the

r these schools, a bill was passed by the two branches of the Legislature, and assented to by His Excellency, providing for two years an additional grant of $22,000. This sum was allotted to the severa

a first time. The bill proposed to repeal all previous Common School legislation; to establish a General Board and also District Boards of Ed

cation. This is proposed to be left to the Governor, or person administering the Government, a proposition, in our opinion, radically objectionable. It makes the system of education, in theory, a mere engine of the Executive, a system which is liable to all the abuse, suspicion, jealousy and opposition caused by despotism; and it withholds from the system of Common School education, in its first and prominent feature, that character of common interest and harmonious co-operation which, as we humbly conceive, are essential to its success, and even to its acceptance with the Province. Education is an object in which the Government, as an indiv

in favour of reform principles, and wholly opposed to the arbitrary and aristocratic ideas of the Legis

al Office, stating His Majesty's readiness to transfer 240,000 acres in the settled town

wing for two years, 1835 and 1836, the in

echanics' Institutes at York and a

l to amend the charter of King's College. These amendments were designed to remove all religious tests and to have the College governed by a Council, half of whom were to be appointed by the Assembly and half by the Legislative Council. The only reasons given by the Council for rejecting these amendments were that they knew of no university so governed and that a university must have as a basis some established form of religion. In the meantime, while the hide-bound wo

nd yet they firmly refused to surrender the charter and endowment of King's College when requested and even urged to do so by His Majesty's Colonial Secretary[46]. From 1831 to 1835, the Council refused to accept any substantia

borne, as a concession to the Assembly, proposed that five out of seven of the governing body should be permanently of the faith of the Church of England. The other two members were to be the Lieutenant-Governor and the Archdeacon of York! Lord Glenelg, in reply, says: "I cannot hesitate to express my opinion that this plan claims for the Established Church of England privileges which those who best understand and most deeply prize her real interests would not think it prudent to assert for her in any British Province on the North American Continent.... I would respectfully and earnestly impress upon the Members of both these Bodies [Assembly and Council] the expediency of e

Download App
icon APP STORE
icon GOOGLE PLAY