est wa

for high-achieving students from influential backgrounds, held significant sway. However, a group of dete

ances. Their mission was to advocate for fairness and equality, targeting the school's biased policies. Unf

ation, suspended the student leaders for a month. The harsh punishment sent a chil

eed and favoritism perpetuated a system where only students from affluent backgrounds thriv

that the NO.1 of the elitist group had orchestrated the principal's actions. The rumor was later corr

y, unencumbered by accountability or moral scrutiny. The absence of the school's owner, who was reportedly out of the c

tain from disseminating the video online. However, some elitist students who dissented from the group's stance courageously po

tizing power and control, while others valued transparency and accountability. The students' acti